THE (SCIENTIFIC) DEATH OF JESUS

THE (SCIENTIFIC) DEATH OF JESUS 

At the age of 33, Jesus was condemned to the death penalty.

At the time crucifixion was the “worst” death. Only the worst criminals condemned to be crucified. Yet it was even more dreadful for Jesus, unlike other criminals condemned to death by crucifixion Jesus was to be nailed to the cross by His hands and feet.

Each nail was 6 to 8 inches long.

The nails were driven into His wrist.  Not into His palms as is commonly portrayed. There’s a tendon in the wrist that extends to the shoulder.  The Roman guards knew that when the nails were being hammered into the wrist that tendon would tear and break, forcing Jesus to use His back muscles to support himself so that He could breath.

Both of His feet were nailed together.  Thus He was forced to support Himself on the single nail that impaled His feet to the cross.  Jesus could not support himself with His legs because of the pain so He was forced to alternate between arching His back then using his legs just to continue to breath.  Imagine the struggle, the pain, the suffering, the courage.

Jesus endured this reality for over 3 hours.

Yes, over 3 hours! Can you imagine this kind of suffering?  A few minutes before He died, Jesus stopped bleeding.

He was simply pouring water from his wounds.

From common images we see wounds to His hands and feet and even the spear wound to His side.  But do we realize His wounds were actually made in his body.  A hammer driving large nails through the wrist, the feet overlapped and an even large nail hammered through the arches, then a Roman guard piercing His side with a spear.   But before the nails and the spear Jesus was whipped and beaten.  The whipping was so severe that it tore the flesh from His body.  The beating so horrific that His face was torn and his beard ripped from His face.  The crown of thorns cut deeply into His scalp.  Most men would not have survived this torture.

He had no more blood to bleed out, only water poured from His wounds.

The human adult body contains about 3.5 litres (just less than a gallon) of blood.

Jesus poured all 3.5 litres of his blood; He had three nails hammered into his members; a crown of  thorns on his head and, beyond that, a Roman soldier who stabbed a spear into his chest.

All these without mentioning the humiliation He passed after carrying his own cross for almost 2 kilometers, while the crowd spat in his face and threw stones (the cross was almost 30 kg of weight, only for its higher part, where his hands were nailed).

Jesus had to endure this experience, so that you can have free access to God.

So that your sins could be “washed” away. All of them, with no exception! Don’t ignore this situation. JESUS CHRIST DIED FOR YOU!

2 men on an island.

2 men on an island.

 

A  voyaging ship was wrecked during a storm at sea  and only two of the  men on it were able to swim to a small, desert like island. The  two survivors, not knowing what else to do, agree that they had no  other recourse but to pray to God.

However, to find out whose  prayer was more powerful, they agreed to divide the territory  between them and stay on opposite sides of the island.

The  first thing the first man prayed for was food.  The next morning, the  first man saw  a fruit-bearing tree on his side of the land,  and  he was able to eat its fruit..

The other man’s parcel of land  remained barren.

After a week, the first man was lonely  and  he decided to pray for a wife.  The next day, another ship was wrecked, and the only survivor was a woman who swam to his side of the land..

On the other side of the island, there was nothing.

Soon the first man prayed for a house, clothes, more food..  The next day, like magic, all of these were given to  him.

However, the second man still had  not  a  thing..

Finally, the first man prayed for a ship,  so that  his wife and he could leave the island.  In the morning, he found a  ship docked at his side of the island.

The first man boarded  the ship with his wife and decided to leave the second man on the  island.  He considered the other man unworthy to receive God’s blessings, since none of his prayers had been answered.

As the ship Was about to leave, the first man heard a voice from Heaven  booming,  ‘Why are you leaving your companion on the island?’

‘My blessings are mine alone, since I was the one who prayed  for them,’ the first man answered.  ‘His prayers were all  unanswered, and so he does not deserve anything.’

‘You are  mistaken!’ the voice rebuked him. ‘He had only one prayer, which I answered. If not for that, you would not have received any of my blessings.’

‘Tell me,’ the first man  asked the voice, ‘what did he pray for that I should owe him  anything?’

‘He prayed that all your prayers be answered.’

For  all we know, our blessings are not the fruits of our prayers alone, but those of another praying for us..

When Jesus died on the cross he was thinking of you!

The Collection Plate (a must read)

Every time I read this, I get teary-eyed at the end!

                            — Evangelist Joe Collins

The Collection Plate (a must read) 

Here is a true story about a nine year old boy who lived in a rural town in Tennessee.   His house was in a poor area of the community. A church had a bus ministry that came knocking on his door one afternoon. The kid came to answer the door and greeted the bus pastor. The bus pastor asked if his parents were home and the small boy told him that his parents take off every weekend and leave him at home to take care of his little brother. The bus pastor couldn’t believe what the kid said and asked him to repeat it. The youngster gave the same answer and the bus pastor asked to come in and talk with him. They went into the living room and sat down on an old couch with the foam and springs exposed.

The bus pastor asked the kid, ‘Where do you go to church? The young boy surprised the visitor by replying, ‘I’ve never been to church in my whole life.’

The bus pastor thought to himself about the fact that his church was less than three miles from the child’s house. ‘Are you sure you have never been to church?’ he asked again. ‘I sure haven’t’, came his answer. Then the bus pastor said, Well, son, more important than going to church, have you ever heard the greatest love story ever told?’ and then he proceeded to share the Gospel with this little nine year old boy. The young lad’s heart began to be tenderized and at the end of the bus pastor’s story the bus pastor asked if the boy wanted to receive this free gift from God.

The youngster exclaimed, ‘You bet!’ The kid and the bus pastor got on their knees and the lad invited Jesus into his little heart and received the free gift of salvation. They both stood up and the bus pastor asked if he could pick the kid up for church the next morning. ‘Sure,’ the nine old replied.

The bus pastor got to the house early the next morning and found the lights off. He let himself in and snaked his way through the house and found the little boy asleep in his bed. He woke up the little boy and his brother and helped get them dressed. They got on the bus and ate a donut for breakfast on their way to church. Keep in mind that this boy had never been to church before. The church was a real big one. The little kid just sat there, clueless of what was going on.

A few minutes into the service these tall unhappy guys walked down to the front and picked up some wooden plates. One of the men prayed and the kid with utter fascination watched them walk up and down the aisles. He still didn’t know what was going on. All of a sudden like a bolt of lightning it hit the kid what was taking place. These people must be giving money to Jesus. He then reflected on the free gift of life he had received just twenty-four hours earlier. He immediately searched his pockets, front and back, and couldn’t find a thing to give Jesus. By this time the offering plate was being passed down his aisle and with a broken heart he just grabbed the plate and held on to it. He finally let go and watched it pass on down the aisle. He turned around to see it passed down the aisle behind him. And then his eyes remained glued on the plate as it was passed back and forth, back and forth all the way to the rear of the sanctuary. Then he had an idea.

This little nine year old boy, in front of God and everybody, got up out of his seat. He walked about eight rows back, grabbed the usher by the coat and asked to hold the plate one more time. Then he did the most astounding thing I have ever heard of. He took the plate, sat it on the carpeted church floor and stepped into the center of it. As he stood there, he lifted his little head up and said, ‘Jesus, I don’t have anything to give you today, but just me. I give you me!’

I do love Jesus. He is my source of existence and my Savior. He keeps me functioning each and everyday. Without Him, I will be nothing. Without Him, I am nothing. With Him I can do all things.
Phil 4:13

NAILS DIDN’T HOLD JESUS TO THE CROSS. LOVE DID!

Erasmus Darwin came up with ‘evolution’, not Charles Darwin

When I talk to people who are evolutionists, it surprises me that most don’t even know the truth of ‘evolution theory’ origins. They say that Charles Darwin created, but he didn’t, he just made it famous. As a high school and college drop out, Charles knew little to nothing about Science and how things work. All he knew, was what his GRANDFATHER and his grandfather’s FRIENDS taught he and how to view things….

When people see the origins of evolution, it helps shaken its grip of lies off of them!

Here is a bio of Charles Darwins’ grandfather, Erasmus, proving my point!

— Evangelist Joe Collins

 

 

 

 

Erasmus Darwin

This article is about Erasmus Darwin, who lived 1731–1802; for his descendants with the same name, see Erasmus Darwin (disambiguation).
Erasmus Darwin

Erasmus Darwin in 1792
Born 12 December 1731(1731-12-12)
Elston Hall, Elston, Nottinghamshire
near Newark-on-Trent
Died 18 April 1802 (aged 70)
Breadsall, Derby
Erasmus Darwin (12 December 1731 – 18 April 1802) was an English physician who turned down George III’s invitation to be a physician to the King. He was also a natural philosopher, physiologist, abolitionist, inventor and poet. His poems included much natural history, including a statement of evolution and the relatedness of all forms of life. He was a member of the Darwin–Wedgwood family, which includes his grandsons Charles Darwin and Francis Galton. Darwin was also a founding member of the Lunar Society of Birmingham, a discussion group of pioneering industrialists and natural philosophers.

Erasmus Darwin House, his home in Lichfield, is now a museum dedicated to Erasmus Darwin and his life’s work.

Contents
1 Life
1.1 Early life
1.2 Marriages and children
1.3 Death
2 Writings
2.1 Botanical works
2.2 Zoönomia
2.3 Poem on evolution
2.4 Education of women
3 Lunar Society
4 Other activities
4.1 Cosmological speculation
4.2 Inventions
4.3 Rocket engine
5 Major publications
6 Family tree
7 Appearance in fiction and music
8 See also
9 References
10 Further reading
11 External links

Life
Early life

Stone-cast bust of Erasmus Darwin, by W. J. Coffee, c. 1795Born at Elston Hall, Nottinghamshire near Newark-on-Trent, England, the youngest of seven children of Robert Darwin of Elston (12 August 1682–20 November 1754), a lawyer, and his wife Elizabeth Hill (1702–1797). His parents’ choice of name, Erasmus, is an unusual one; the most historically significant person of that name was Desiderius Erasmus, the great humanist. His siblings were:

Robert Darwin (17 October 1724–4 November 1816)
Elizabeth Darwin (15 September 1725–8 April 1800)
William Alvey Darwin (3 October 1726–7 October 1783)
Anne Darwin (12 November 1727–3 August 1813)
Susannah Darwin (10 April 1729–29 September 1789)
John Darwin, rector of Elston (28 September 1730–24 May 1805)
He was educated at Chesterfield Grammar School, then later at St John’s College, Cambridge.[1] He obtained his medical education at the University of Edinburgh Medical School. Whether Darwin ever obtained the formal degree of MD is not known.

Darwin settled in 1756 as a physician at Nottingham, but met with little success and so moved the following year to Lichfield to try to establish a practice there. A few weeks after his arrival, using a novel course of treatment, he restored the health of a young man whose death seemed inevitable. This ensured his success in the new locale. Darwin was a highly successful physician for more than fifty years in the Midlands. George III invited him to be Royal Physician, but Darwin declined. In Lichfield, Darwin wrote “didactic poetry, developed his system of evolution, and invented amongst other things, an organ able to recite the Lord’s Prayer, the Creed, and the Ten Commandments”.[2]

Marriages and children

Darwin in 1770Darwin married twice and had 14 children, including two illegitimate daughters by an employee, and, possibly, at least one further illegitimate daughter.

In 1757, he married Mary (Polly) Howard (1740–1770). They had four sons and one daughter, two of whom (a son and a daughter) died in infancy:

Charles Darwin (1758-1778)
Erasmus Darwin II (1759–1799)
Elizabeth Darwin (1763, survived 4 months)
Robert Waring Darwin (1766–1848), father of the naturalist Charles Darwin
William Alvey Darwin (1767, survived 19 days)
The first Mrs. Darwin died in 1770. A governess, Mary Parker, was hired to look after Robert. By late 1771, employer and employee had become intimately involved and together they had two illegitimate daughters:

Susanna Parker (1772–1856)
Mary Parker Jr (1774–1859)
Susanna and Mary Jr later established a boarding school for girls. In 1782, Mary Sr (the governess) married Joseph Day (1745–1811), a Birmingham merchant, and moved away.

Darwin may have fathered another child, this time with a married woman. A Lucy Swift gave birth in 1771 to a baby, also named Lucy, who was christened a daughter of her mother and William Swift, but there is reason to believe the father was really Darwin.[3] Lucy Jr. married John Hardcastle in Derby in 1792 and their daughter, Mary, married Francis Boott, the physician.

In 1775, Darwin met Elizabeth Pole, daughter of Charles Colyear, 2nd Earl of Portmore, and wife of Colonel Edward Pole (1718–1780); but as she was married, Darwin could only make his feelings known for her through poetry. When Edward Pole died, Darwin married Elizabeth and moved to her home, Radbourne Hall, four miles (6 km) west of Derby. The hall and village are these days known as Radbourne. In 1782, they moved to Full Street, Derby. They had four sons, one of whom died in infancy, and three daughters:

Edward Darwin (1782–1829)
Frances Ann Violetta Darwin (1783–1874), married Samuel Tertius Galton, was the mother of Francis Galton
Emma Georgina Elizabeth Darwin (1784–1818)
Sir Francis Sacheverel Darwin (1786–1859)
John Darwin (1787–1818)
Henry Darwin (1789–1790), died in infancy.
Harriet Darwin (1790–1825), married Admiral Thomas James Malling

Death
Darwin died suddenly on the 18 April 1802, weeks after having moved to Breadsall Priory, just north of Derby. He is buried in All Saints Church, Breadsall.

Erasmus Darwin is commemorated on one of the Moonstones, a series of monuments in Birmingham.

Writings
Botanical works
Darwin formed the Lichfield Botanical Society in order to translate the works of the Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus from Latin into English. This took seven years. The result was two publications: A System of Vegetables between 1783 and 1785, and The Families of Plants in 1787. In these volumes, Darwin coined many of the English names of plants that we use today.

Darwin then wrote The Loves of the Plants, a long poem, which was a popular rendering of Linnaeus’ works. Darwin also wrote Economy of Vegetation, and together the two were published as The Botanic Garden.

Zoönomia
Darwin’s most important scientific work is Zoönomia (1794–1796), which contains a system of pathology, and a treatise on “generation”, in which he anticipated the views of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, and Lamarckism, which foreshadowed the modern theory of evolution and the modern evolutionary synthesis. Darwin based his theories on David Hartley’s psychological theory of associationism.[4] The essence of his views is contained in the following passage, which he follows up with the conclusion that one and the same kind of living filament is and has been the cause of all organic life:

Would it be too bold to imagine that, in the great length of time since the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the commencement of the history of mankind would it be too bold to imagine that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament, which the great First Cause endued with animality, with the power of acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by irritations, sensations, volitions and associations, and thus possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent activity, and of delivering down these improvements by generation to its posterity, world without end!

Erasmus Darwin was familiar with the earlier evolutionary thinking of James Burnett, Lord Monboddo, and cited him in his 1803 work Temple of Nature.

Poem on evolution
Erasmus Darwin offered the first glimpse of his theory of evolution, obliquely, in a question at the end of a long footnote to his popular poem The Loves of the Plants (1789), which was republished throughout the 1790s in several editions as The Botanic Garden. His poetic concept was to anthropomorphize the stamen (male) and pistil (female) sexual organs, as bride and groom. In this stanza on the flower Curcuma (also Flax and Tumeric) the “youths” are infertile, and he devotes the footnote to other examples of neutered organs in flowers, insect castes, and finally associates this more broadly with many popular and well-known cases of vestigal organs (male nipples, the third and fourth wings of flies, etc.)

65 Woo’d with long care, CURCUMA cold and shy
Meets her fond husband with averted eye:
Four beardless youths the obdurate beauty move
With soft attentions of Platonic love.

“Curcuma_. l. 65. Turmeric. One male and one female inhabit this flower; but there are besides four imperfect males, or filaments without anthers upon them, called by Linneus eunuchs. The flax of our country has ten filaments, and but five of them are terminated with anthers; the Portugal flax has ten perfect males, or stamens; the Verbena of our country has four males; that of Sweden has but two; the genus Albuca, the Bignonia Catalpa, Gratiola, and hemlock-leaved Geranium have only half their filaments crowned with anthers. In like manner the florets, which form the rays of the flowers of the order frustraneous polygamy of the class syngenesia, or confederate males, as the sun-flower, are furnished with a style only, and no stigma: and are thence barren. There is also a style without a stigma in the whole order dioecia gynandria; the male flowers of which are thence barren. The Opulus is another plant, which contains some unprolific flowers. In like manner some tribes of insects have males, females, and neuters among them: as bees, wasps, ants.”[citation needed]

“There is a curious circumstance belonging to the class of insects which have two wings, or diptera, analogous to the rudiments of stamens above described; viz. two little knobs are found placed each on a stalk or peduncle, generally under a little arched scale; which appear to be rudiments of hinder wings; and are called by Linneus, halteres, or poisers, a term of his introduction. A.T. Bladh. Amaen. Acad. V. 7. Other animals have marks of having in a long process of time undergone changes in some parts of their bodies, which may have been effected to accommodate them to new ways of procuring their food. The existence of teats on the breasts of male animals, and which are generally replete with a thin kind of milk at their nativity, is a wonderful instance of this kind. Perhaps all the productions of nature are in their progress to greater perfection! an idea countenanced by the modern discoveries and deductions concerning the progressive formation of the solid parts of the terraqueous globe, and consonant to the dignity of the Creator of all things.”[citation needed]

Darwin’s final long poem, The Temple of Nature, was published posthumously in 1803. The poem was originally titled The Origin of Society. It is considered his best poetic work. It centers on his own newly-conceived theory of evolution. The poem traces the progression of life from microorganisms to civilized society. Darwin largely anticipated most of what his grandson Charles Darwin would later propose, except for the idea of natural selection.

His poetry was admired by Coleridge and Wordsworth. It often made reference to his interests in science; for example botany and steam engines.

Education of women
The last two leaves of Darwin’s A plan for the conduct of female education in boarding schools (1797) contain a book list, an apology for the work, and an advert for “Miss Parkers School”. The work probably resulted from his liaison with Mary Parker. The school advertised on the last page is the one he set up in Ashbourne, Derbyshire for their two illegitimate children, Susanna and Mary.

Darwin regretted that a good education had not been generally available to women in Britain in his time, and drew on the ideas of Locke, Rousseau, and Genlis in organising his thoughts. Addressing the education of middle class girls, Darwin argued that amorous romance novels were inappropriate and that they should seek simplicity in dress. He contends that young women should be educated in schools, rather than privately at home, and learn appropriate subjects. These subjects include physiognomy, physical exercise, botany, chemistry, mineralogy, and experimental philosophy. They should familiarize themselves with arts and manufactures through visits to sites like Coalbrookdale, and Wedgwood’s potteries; they should learn how to handle money, and study modern languages. Darwin’s educational philosophy took the view that men and women should have different, but complementary capabilities, skills, spheres, and interests.[5] In the context of the times, this program may be read as a modernising influence.

Lunar Society
The Lunar Society: these dates indicate the year in which Darwin became friends with these people, who, in turn, became members of the Lunar Society. The Lunar Society existed from 1765 to 1813.

Before 1765:

Matthew Boulton, originally a buckle maker in Birmingham
John Whitehurst of Derby, maker of clocks and scientific instruments, pioneer of geology
After 1765:

Josiah Wedgwood, potter 1765
Dr. William Small, 1765, man of science, formerly Professor of Natural Philosophy at the College of William and Mary, where Thomas Jefferson was an appreciative pupil
Richard Lovell Edgeworth, 1766, inventor
James Watt, 1767, improver of steam engine
James Keir, 1767, pioneer of the chemical industry
Thomas Day, 1768, eccentric and author
Dr. William Withering, 1775, the death of Dr. Small left an opening for a physician in the group.
Joseph Priestly, 1780, experimental chemist and discoverer of many substances.
Samuel Galton, 1782, a Quaker gunmaker with a taste for science, took Darwin’s place after Darwin moved to Derby.
Darwin also established a lifelong friendship with Benjamin Franklin, who shared Darwin’s support for the American and French revolutions. The Lunar Society was instrumental as an intellectual driving force behind England’s Industrial Revolution.

The members of the Lunar Society, and especially Darwin, opposed the slave trade. He attacked it in The Botanic Garden (1789–1791), and in The Loves of Plants (1789) and The Economy of Vegetation (1791).

Other activities
In addition to the Lunar Society, Erasmus Darwin belonged to the influential Derby Philosophical Society, as did his brother-in-law Samuel Fox (see family tree below). He experimented with the use of air and gases to alleviate infections and cancers in patients. A Pneumatic Institution was established at Clifton in 1799 for clinically testing these ideas. He conducted research into the formation of clouds, on which he published in 1788. He also inspired Robert Weldon’s Somerset Coal Canal caisson lock.

Darwin’s experiments in galvanism were an important source of inspiration for Mary Shelley to write Frankenstein.[citation needed]

Cosmological speculation
Contemporary literature dates the cosmological theories of the Big Bang and Big Crunch to the 19th and 20th centuries. However Erasmus Darwin had speculated on these sorts of events in The Botanic Garden, A Poem in Two Parts: Part 1, The Economy of Vegetation, 1791:

Roll on, ye Stars! exult in youthful prime,
Mark with bright curves the printless steps of Time;
Near and more near your beamy cars approach,
And lessening orbs on lessening orbs encroach; —
Flowers of the sky! ye too to age must yield,
Frail as your silken sisters of the field!
Star after star from Heaven’s high arch shall rush,
Suns sink on suns, and systems systems crush,
Headlong, extinct, to one dark center fall,
And Death and Night and Chaos mingle all!
— Till o’er the wreck, emerging from the storm,
Immortal Nature lifts her changeful form,
Mounts from her funeral pyre on wings of flame,
And soars and shines, another and the same.

Inventions
Darwin was the inventor of several devices, though he did not patent any. He believed this would damage his reputation as a doctor, and encouraged his friends to patent their own modifications of his designs.

A horizontal windmill, which he designed for Josiah Wedgwood (who would be Charles Darwin’s other grandfather, see family tree below).
A carriage that would not tip over (1766).
A speaking machine (at Clifton in 1799).
A canal lift for barges.
A minute artificial bird.
A copying machine (1778).
A variety of weather monitoring machines.
An artesian well (1783).

Rocket engine
In notes dating to 1779, Darwin made a sketch of a simple liquid-fuel rocket engine, with hydrogen and oxygen tanks connected by plumbing and pumps to an elongated combustion chamber and expansion nozzle, a concept not to be seen again until one century later.

Major publications
Erasmus Darwin, A Botanical Society at Lichfield. A System of Vegetables, according to their classes, orders… translated from the 13th edition of Linnaeus’ Systema Vegetabiliium. 2 vols., 1783, Lichfield, J. Jackson, for Leigh and Sotheby, London.
Erasmus Darwin, A Botanical Society at Lichfield. The Families of Plants with their natural characters…Translated from the last edition of Linnaeus’ Genera Plantarum. 1787, Lichfield, J. Jackson, for J. Johnson, London.
Erasmus Darwin, The Botanic Garden, Part I, The Economy of Vegetation. 1791 London, J. Johnson.
Part II, The Loves of the Plants. 1789, London, J. Johnson.
Erasmus Darwin, Zoonomia; or, The Laws of Organic Life, 1794, Part I. London, J. Johnson,
Part I-III. 1796, London, J. Johnson.
Darwin, Erasmus 1797. A plan for the conduct of female education in boarding schools. J. Johnson, Derby. 4to, 128 pages; last two leaves contain a book list, an apology for the work, and an advert for “Miss Parkers School”.
Erasmus Darwin, Phytologia; or, The Philosophy of Agriculture and Gardening. 1800, London, J. Johnson.
Erasmus Darwin, The Temple of Nature; or, The Origin of Society. 1806–1807, London, J. Johnson.

Appearance in fiction and music
Charles Sheffield, an author noted largely for hard science fiction, wrote a number of stories featuring Darwin in a manner quite similar to Sherlock Holmes. These stories were collected in a book, The Amazing Dr. Darwin.
Darwin’s opposition to slavery in poetry was included by Benjamin Zephaniah in a reading. This inspired the establishment of the Genomic Dub Collective, whose album includes quotations from Erasmus “Ras” Darwin, his grandson Charles Darwin and Haile Selassie.
The forgetting of Erasmus’ designs for a rocket is a major plot point in Stephan Baxter’s tale of alternate universes, Manifold: Origin.
Phrases from Darwin’s poem The Botanic Garden are used as chapter headings in The Pornographer of Vienna by Lewis Crofts.
British poet J.H. Prynne took on the pseudonym Erasmus W. Darwin for his “plant time” bulletins in the pages of Bean News (1972).

See also
Erasmus Darwin House – The Museum of Erasmus Darwin in Lichfield, Staffordshire
Evolutionary ideas of the renaissance and enlightenment
History of evolutionary thought

References
^ Darwin, Erasmus in Venn, J. & J. A., Alumni Cantabrigienses, Cambridge University Press, 10 vols, 1922–1958.
^ Pevsner N. The Buildings of England: Nottinghamshire. Penguin, Harmondsworth 1951. p67
^ Error 404
^ Allen, Richard C. 1999. David Hartley on human nature. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press. ISBN 0-7914-4233-0
^ DNB entry for Erasmus Darwin. Oxford.

Further reading
Darwin, Erasmus. (1794-6). Zoonomia. J. Johnson (reissued by Cambridge University Press, 2009; ISBN 9781108005494)
King-Hele, Desmond. 1963. Doctor Darwin. Scribner’s, N.Y.
King-Hele, Desmond. 1977. Doctor of Revolution: the life and genius of Erasmus Darwin. Faber, London.
King-Hele, Desmond (ed) 1981. The Letters of Erasmus Darwin Cambridge University Press.
King-Hele, Desmond. 1999. Erasmus Darwin: a life of unequalled achievement Giles de la Mare Publishers.
King-Hele, Desmond (ed) 2002. Charles Darwin’s ‘The Life of Erasmus Darwin Cambridge University Press.
Krause, Ernst 1879. Erasmus Darwin, with a preliminary notice by Charles Darwin. Murray, London.
Pearson, Hesketh. 1930. Doctor Darwin. Dent, London.
Porter, Roy, 1989. ‘Erasmus Darwin: doctor of evolution?’ in ‘History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays for John C. Greene, ed. James R. Moore.
Seward, Anna 1804. Memoirs of the life of Dr. Darwin.
Uglow, Jennifer 2003. Lunar Men: the friends who made the future Faber, London.

External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Erasmus Darwin
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Erasmus Darwin
Works by Erasmus Darwin at Project Gutenberg
Erasmus Darwin House, Lichfield
Revolutionary Players website
“Preface and ‘a preliminary notice'” by Charles Darwin in Ernst Krause, Erasmus Darwin (1879)
“Darwin, Erasmus”. Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911.

Persondata
NAME Darwin, Erasmus
ALTERNATIVE NAMES
SHORT DESCRIPTION English physician, botanist; member of the Lunar Society
DATE OF BIRTH 12 December 1731(1731-12-12)
PLACE OF BIRTH Elston Hall near Nottingham, England
DATE OF DEATH 18 April 1802
PLACE OF DEATH Breadsall Priory near Derby, England

Evolution teaches that a Whale in Lumpoc California stood on its tailfin for 50,000 years til it was completely fossilized!

I will bold the area where this can be found in the paper!

Thanks and please after reading it, go back and read the whole thing!

God Bless
— Evangelist Joe

—————————————————————————————————-

TURBIDITES: A CHALLENGE TO UNIFORMITARIANISM
By Kurt Howard, M.S.
Edited by Jon Covey, B.A., MT(ASCP)

My physical geology professor said, “Regarding uniformitarianism, you can take it with a grain of salt.” After reviewing geology texts on the subject of turbidites, I am following the courageous professor’s advice. To paraphrase his words, I am taking uniformitarianism with a grain of sand, for the philosophy of uniformitarianism states that sedimentary layers form over many millions of years, while much recent research has shown that turbidites form within a few hours. {1}

Geologists believe that turbidites are sandstone beds resulting from turbidity currents occurring sporadically and often catastrophically underwater. These underwater currents loaded with varying amounts of sediment, move rapidly down even slight slopes along the ocean bottom for great distances. They originate from underwater slumps or slides often triggered by earthquakes or storm surges. Modern turbidites represent the redeposition of sediments deposited on continental margins by floods and mud- and sand-laden rivers. Ancient turbidites may represent the redeposition of sediments produced during a catastrophic worldwide flood, flowing as turbidity currents into basins that formed during massive tectonic upheavals and mountain-building events.

Turbidity currents are only one of many processes which redistribute material on the earth’s surface or underwater. There is a continuum of sedimentary flows which are classified arbitrarily according to particle size. These include avalanches, mudflows, lahars (from glacial meltwater), and volcanic tuffs. Most of these processes occur both on land and under water. Turbidity flows involve mostly sand to silt sized particles and occur only under water. They are density flows, since the dense sediment-laden current sinks to the bottom of the ocean (or lake) and travels along the bottom for long distances, covering thousands of square miles uniformly, sometimes hundreds of meters thick.

In 1972 Burgert identified several lower basal Tapeats units as turbidites in Grand Canyon’s Cheops Bay. Dr. Ariel Roth, a geologist at Loma Linda University’s Geoscience Institute, suggested that 30% of all sedimentary rocks in Grand Canyon are turbidites. Some geologists suggest that 50% of the world’s sedimentary rocks might be turbidites. If this is true, and it will take much field work to confirm, it will greatly strengthen the case for a global flood. A review of the scientific literature through on-line database search commands reveals thousands of articles on turbidites for the last few years. From 1940 to 1965, geologists identified a very massive type of turbidite bed that they named flysch. A flysch generally forms in a geosyncline: a very large, long trough or basin that has folded and faulted at the perimeter of continents.

The Appalachians are an uplifted geosyncline according to Tarbuck and Lutgens. Flysch deposits are tens of thousands of meters thick, about ten times thicker than non-flysch turbidite layers. An ancient turbidite in the Great Valley of California is this thick. Graywacke is the sandstone present in flysch turbidites and has a relatively high amount of clay or mud, sometimes earning the name of dirty sandstone. However, clay predominates in flysch deposits, and the graywacke layers are interbedded in the clay. Flysch is found all over the world and is dated mainly from the Paleozoic era (about 225-570 million years ago).

Modern geologists discarded the terms flysch sediments and geosyncline because rapidly formed megathick flysch is incompatible with uniformitarianism and long ages. However, in the last few years, the number of geologists abandoning the classical uniformitarian discipline and adopting the new catastrophism is almost a shock to observing creationists. Geologists are finally beginning to grudgingly agree with us creationists about the nature of the stratigraphic record, which is a record of major catastrophic events and not the slow year-by-year buildup suggested by uniformitarianism. Flysch deposits might be the sedimentary results of a global flood. The idea of geosynclines is unpopular because most geologists believe in plate tectonics.

Graded bedding is one of the main features of turbidity currents, in fact the terms are almost synonymous. Normal graded bedding is present in beds where the grain size is coarse at the base and gradually becomes fine at the top. However, graded bedding is only part of the turbidite sequence that Bouma identified and it is the popular model for turbidite deposits. {2} The Bouma sequence consists of the following five levels going from the bottom of the bed to the top. Level A is massive or graded sandstone, sometimes having pebbles or mudripup clasts at the base, Level B is plane laminated sand. Level C is crosslaminated sand sometimes with ripples. Level D contains plane laminated silt or clay and Level E is non-laminated mud.

Each level represents different flow conditions or velocities. Levels D and E represent suspension deposits. While these five levels are the ideal, all five levels are not always present, depending on distance from the source and the nature of the source material. Investigation of fossils associated with turbidites often indicates that levels A, B and C contain benthonic (bottom dwelling) microfauna that dwell in shallow water and live on the continental shelf Levels D and E, on the other hand, contain deep marine microfauna such as radiolarians which settled out of suspension. This supports the understanding that the sands traveled in a turbidity current from shallow areas down to the deep marine continental rise or deep-sea basin.

Muds of Level D and E, containing deep sea microfauna are believed to have settled from fine clay-sized material in suspension following the deposition of the sand turbidity current. Turbidites are common all over the world. The first underwater flow that was attributed to a turbidity current occurred on the continental shelf off the coast of Grand Banks, Nova Scotia in 1929 . An earthquake triggered a turbidity current that over a period of several hours successively snapped transatlantic cables lying on the continental shelf Modem turbidites have flowed the full length of Lake Mead, where the gradient is only 1: 1000, supporting the view that turbidity currents can flow hundreds of kilometers from their source. Since geologists generally agree that the sandstone part of a turbidite (Levels A-C) settles rapidly, i.e., in tens of minutes, the logical question is to ask how long does it take for the mud in Levels D and E to deposit from suspension.

Uniformitarian evolutionists believe that the sedimentation rate for the muds is very slow, requiring tens or hundreds of millions of years for the formation. Holroyd discusses the problems that arise from this model. {3} Holroyd says that the sedimentation rate for the uniformitarian model is very slow: a few micrometers per year for a 200 meter stratum assumed to be 50 million years old. At that minuscule rate most organisms of any size would rot and be scavenged long before they could be buried and fossilized. Many evolutionists recognize this problem and opt for periods of rapid sedimentation followed by long periods of non-sedimentation. The problem here is that when there is cessation of sedimentation erosion begins, causing gullies and channels and plant growth develops soils. Most flysch and turbidite deposits, however, show apparently continuous deposition and rarely show evidence of erosion. Furthermore, no layers of ancient soil with roots and other evidence of vegetation are found. This supports the view of rapid deposition of the entire flysch or turbidite formation. The widespread presence of turbidite deposits represents a fertile field for flood geologists not encumbered with uniformitarian and evolutionary bias to reinterpret the evidence of the rocks and uncover the truth of Earth’s early history.

THE FOSSILIZATION PROCESS
In A New Look at the Dinosaurs, Alan Charig, Curator of Fossil Amphibians, Reptiles and Birds at the British Museum of Natural History gives the standard explanation for how animal remains become fossilized. He says,

“…when the dinosaur had died near a river or in a swamp it stood a much better chance of being preserved. Its body might sink into the mud on the spot, or floodwaters might sweep it into the river to float downstream and end up on a sandbar, on the bottom of a lake or even in the sea. The flesh would decay and the bones would gradually be covered by sediments–such as mud or sand–which are always accumulating in such places.” {5}

Atheist Immanuel Velikovsky wrote: “When a fish dies its body bloats on the surface or sinks to the bottom and is devoured rather quickly, actually in a matter of hours, by other fish. However, the fossil fish found in sedimentary rock is very often preserved with all its bones intact. Entire shoals of fish over large areas, numbering billions of specimens, are found in a state of agony, but with no mark of a scavenger’s attack. “The explanation of the origin of fossils by the theory of uniformity and evolution contradicts the fundamental principle of these theories: Nothing took place in the past that does not take place in the present Today no fossils are formed.” {6}

Which man, Velikovsky or Charig, more accurately describes the nature of the fossil record?

POLYSTRATE FOSSILS AND CATASTROPHIC GEOLOGY
Individual fossils that traverse two or more sedimentary strata are polystrate fossils (poly meaning many; strate referring to strata or layers). In Lompoc, California, the fossil skeleton of a baleen whale was uncovered in a diatomaceous earth quarry. The Chemical & Engineering News report says, “The whale is standing on end in the quarry and is being exposed gradually as the diatomite is mined. Only the head and a small part of the body are visible as yet. The modern baleen whale is 80 to 90 feet long and has a head of similar size, indicating that the fossil may be close to 80 feet long.” {7} Does this mean that many feet thick of diatomaceous earth represents either a major catastrophic event, such as a turbidity current, in which the whale was suddenly buried and was rapidly fossilized or does it mean that the remains of the whale spent an unknown length of time exposed to the elements, scavengers and decay processes while it was slowly buried by dying diatoms and silt before it fossilized. I can argue that it was buried suddenly and rapidly because many such polystrate fossils, from trees to trilobites, have been found all over the world. The best explanation is that they were buried rapidly. The evolutionary explanation is that the organisms were first slowly buried and fossilized in the usual manner, eroded out of the layer in which they were entombed, and then reburied by later periods of sedimentation in an upright position. I don’t believe such fossils stood upright, perpendicular to the plane of sedimentation while they were reburied over long ages. This would have had to have happened many times and is very unlikely. Additionally, the above report on the whale says, “The diatomaceous earth must be taken from around the fossil with great care because the bones are fragile and disintegrate quickly when exposed to air.” This renders it even less likely this whale was ever previously uncovered.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
John Blasdale asks: The article “Melting of wet lithosphere, ” Nature 358 (7-2-92), pp.20-21, enclosed in relation to my comments on seamounts, states that the addition of only a small amount of water (0.4%) reduces the melting point of the rocks on the lithosphere by a couple of hundred degrees–see p. 20, last paragraph. So, would the Earth have been flooded with lava if the water of the Flood had drained into the lithosphere? Or where else might the water have gone? And–if the water is said to have come from the lithosphere, why wasn’t Noah’s Earth flooded with lava instead?

–John Blasdale, Whippany, NJ

John, a Christian evolutionist and my friend, is asking where all the water for the Flood came from and where it went after the Flood was over. He does not believe Noah’s Flood was a global flood. According to the Bible, some of the water for the Flood came from the moisture held in a vapor canopy surrounding the Earth. No one knows how much water came from the rain, but some suggest that there had to be an upper limit on the quantity because of the amount of heat that would be released as the water vapor condensed into rain due to the latent heat of vaporization. Too much condensation would release too much heat and everything aboard the ark would die. The Bible also says that the fountains of the great deep burst open. An unknown amount of water came from these fountains. From what the Bible says, we do know that the water was 22.5 feet higher than all the high mountains over the whole earth.

We know that before the flood, it did not rain, but a mist (or flow) used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground. This mist was not dew, for dew would not provide enough water to keep things alive, nor would it provide enough run-off to keep the four rivers outside the Garden of Eden flowing. Two of those rivers are the Tigris and the Euphrates. Some suggest that the mist came from a system of underground reservoirs called aquifers. The physical characteristics of these aquifers are not known. How the water was stored and how the aquifers were replenished is also unknown. We do know that the Bible says there was a mist, robust enough to water the whole surface of the earth. The aquifers might have been a pressurized, worldwide sprinkling system with the pressure supplied by geothermal heat. Every kilometer in depth, the temperature rises 30°C.

Some speculate that when the fountains of the great deep burst open, the isostatic equilibrium of the continents was disrupted because the sudden burst of water and lava out of the earth was so great (The video, Evidences: The Record and the Flood produced by Loma Linda University geology professors through Geoscience Research Institute, has an excellent depiction of this. The video is available through Geoscience, Box II 19 Hagerstown, NM 21741 for $29.95 plus $4.50 shipping). This caused the continental land masses to bob downward and the oceans completely flooded the land surface. Because continental rock is less dense than the rock beneath it, the continents rose up again and the water rushed back into the ocean basins. Another creationist Flood model results from a computer model John Baumgardner produced, which shows runaway plate subduction. Drs. Steve Austin (ICR), Kurt Wise (ICR), Russ Humphreys (ICR) and Andrew Snelling (CSF) join Baumgardner in this model, which is discussed in our series Catastrophic Plate Tectonics.

The mud flows and turbidity currents from all this would have been prodigious, fully capable of laying down immense conglomerates such as the Shinarump which covers an area of 100,000 square miles to a uniform thickness of about 50 feet. Some feel that the massive ejection of water and lava out of the earth evacuated gigantic underground chambers. The ceilings of these chambers then collapsed, giving the ocean basins even greater depth than before. Most of the water is in the deeper ocean basins and in the polar ice caps (no pre-Flood polar caps). Blasdale is aware that lava deposition is abundant all over the world. Anita and I like to drive on our vacations, and we have seen lava outcroppings and thick layers of lava throughout vast areas of the Western United States, from Colorado to Washington. It seems that it is everywhere, but it is much more abundant and extensive in certain areas such as the Mesa Basalt, which covers most of Oregon and parts of Washington, California, Idaho and Nevada. We know there are at least 50,000 extinct volcanoes, and some of these produced lava flows which may have covered more than 1.5 million square kilometers (580,000 sq. mi.) such as the Deccan Traps. {8}

The world of Noah’s day was inundated by water according to God’s eyewitness report in the Bible. Whether it was likewise flooded by lava, we do not know, since the Bible didn’t make a report on that, but there is lots of lava around. In another issue of Creation in the Crossfire (see An Ice Age Caused by the Genesis Flood), we mentioned that worldwide volcanism at the onset of the Flood and for many years afterwards may have helped set the stage for an ice age. The Bible says Noah’s world perished by water, but the volume of molten rock released when the Earth’s crust was ruptured as the great fountains of the deep burst forth was probably extensive. I know evolutionists assume that these extensive lava formations were the result of volcanic eruptions over millions of years, but there is no way to establish this. My friend, like most people, thinks that radiometric dating can show how old a lava rock is, but radiometric dating is extremely unreliable.

There are many assumptions which must be made, for example, how much daughter product was present when the rock formed, and there are many pitfalls in the dating process itself that compound the problem. When independent labs can vary as much as 100-500 million years for the same rock unit, something is very wrong. That kind of variance is not tolerated in clinical labs, why is it tolerated in geology labs? Why are geochronologists willing to overlook this or cover up the many discordant results, all the while publicly proclaiming great accuracy and precision for radiometric dating? (See Unreliability of Radiometric Dating)

Blasdale thinks young earth creationists are totally wrong about Noah’s flood, otherwise we would find fossilized terrestrial remains mixed with marine fossils. There are such mixtures. Harold Coffin writes, “The Tuscarora and Pocono sandstones in the Eastern United States, the Chinle and Moenkopi formations (which lie just above and below the Shinarump Conglomerate), and many other beds are even more extensive in area. Some are marine–that is, they contain marine fossils and thus might be more readily compared to modem ocean basins or shelves. Others, however, are either land or mixed marine and land formations, which are difficult to explain except by a catastrophe.” {4} There are numerous instances when the so-called oldest fossils are found with the alleged youngest fossils. Evolutionists attempt to explain this as an artifact due to erosion and relithification of the fossils so that the older fossil appears in the same rock as the younger. This is what they call contamination. I call it contamination too, but it is contamination that took place when marine and terrestrial animals were mixed together during the Flood. David Raup, curator at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago thought it funny that creationists kept trying to get their explanation of the perceived order of the fossils in the geologic column reconciled with the Flood. In a letter to Nature, Raup writes:

“One of the ironies of the evolution-creation debate is that the creationists have accepted the mistaken notion that tile fossil record shows a detailed and orderly progression and they have gone to great lengths to accommodate this ‘fact’ in their Flood geology. {9}

ONE FINAL NOTE: from what we’ve covered concerning catastrophic events, one cannot conclude that the flood waters were a homogenous, turbid mixture. That has been one mistake made by most theistic evolutionists who reject the global extent of the Flood.

Footnotes and Bibliography
1 Allen, J.R.L., 1991, The Bouma Division A and the Possible Duration of Turbidity Currents. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, vol 6 1, no. 2, p. 291-295.

2 Bouma A.H., 1962, Sedimentology of some Flysch Deposits Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 168

3 Holroyd, E.W., 1992, Comments on the Fossils of Dinosaur Ridge. Creation Research Society Quarterly. v. 29, no 1, p. 6-13. [Anita and I had the joy of driving past this ridge in August during a rain storm . Too bad we didn’t stop and look around–ed. Yeah. I’m a wimp!

4 Coffin, Harold G. and Robert H Brown, Origin by Design, Review and Herald Publishing Association, Washington, DC, pp. 87-89, 1983, This book is available through Master Books 1-800-999-3777..

5 Charig, Alan, A New Look at the Dinosaurs, Facts On File, Inc., 1983, p.27

6 Velikovsky, Immanuel, Earth in Upheaval, Dell Publishing Co., Inc., New York p.209. This reference is for the paperback edition, not to be confused with the Doubleday and Co edition., 1955.

7 Reese, K.M., “Workers find whale in diatomaceous earth quarry,” Chemical & Engineering News, p. 40, Oct. 11, 1976. This report says that each discovery at the quarry is turned over to the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County to be used for public display and research at the museum. Members of our sister organization were able to handle these remains recently.

8 Krishnan, M.S., Geology of India and Burma, Madras, Higginbotthams, p.536,1968.

9 Raup, David M., Nature, 17 July 1981, p.289

Who are the Elect? Romans 9-11

Dear Evangelist Joe,
Im currently studying this very chapter, and a friend of mine from work is translating it just a little off.

He believes in what’s called the doctrine of the elect…Which obviously the elect is mentioned in Romans ch. 9, but I am pretty sure he is not reading it in the context that Paul was speaking of….

Any input would be greatly appreciated……

From,

—  Gearnut

 

 

Dear Gearnut,

Thank you for writting me. The elect are God’s Chosen people, the jews… we (christians) are adopted in. The bible uses the phrase graphed in for Christians. We find this in the book of Romans. This means that we were added as being part of His children, however, we are not the chosen people(Jews). Those graphed in were the Gentiles.

I know what I am about to type is very long so I suggest printing it out and reading it a little at a time Also I hope this helps you

— Evangelist Joe Collins  (Also you can find what im typing in a book called Jerusalem Countdown by Pastor Hagee)

Who is a Jew?

The raging controversy of ‘Who is a Jew?’ has been a hot button issue among the seed of Abraham for more than two thousand years. Modern Israel, with its Zionist principle of the right of return, offers to any Jewish person in the world the privilege to live in Israel and creates the heated debate, Who is a Jew?

For they are not all Israel who are of Israel. — Romans 9 6

In the old testament, when ancient Israel went after other gods, every Jew in Israel was aware of the contrast made by the prophets between the nation as a whole and the remnant (Rom. 11:5). When Christ was born in Bethlehem, the nation of Israel as a whole was going about its business with little true faith. It was only a few, like Mary and Joseph, Elizabeth and Zacharias, who looked for redemption in Jerusalem (Luke 2:38)

When Jesus began His public ministry and saw Nathaniel for the first time, He said, “Here is a true Israelite…”(John 1:47, NIV). This is exactly the distinction Paul is making in this chapter.

Paul’s prime example of a true Israelite was Abraham. Abraham was not saved by circumcision, because he was declared to be righteous before God in Genesis 15:6, which was years before his circumcision. Abraham was not saved by keeping the Law, because the Law was not given until the time of Moses, which was four hundred years after Abraham’s time.

How did Abraham become a “true Israelite”? It was by faith, not works, as indicated in Genesis 15:6: “And he [Abraham] believed in the Lord [faith], and He [the Lord] counted it to him [Abraham] for righteousness.”

Paul writes: “They are not all Israel who are of Israel” (Romans 9:6).

Paul is saying there’s a difference between all those who claim to be “Abraham’s descendants” and those who constitute Israel as “the people of God”.

Paul Demonstrates, first, that Israel is a matter of election rather than birth (Rom. 9:6-11). Not all those called “children of Abraham” (natural descendants) are actually his “seed” as demonstrated in Genesis 21:12, which states, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.”

Remember that Abraham has two sons. His first son was Ishmael, born to the Egyptian maid Hagar. (See Genesis 16.) But, says Paul, Ishmael, though physical descendant of Abraham, was not of the “seed” (Greek word sperma) that produced Isaac, the spiritual child.

Ishmael was reproduced when Abraham was able to have children in his own sexual strength. Isaac was born by a supernatural act of God, since both Abraham and Sarah were well past the age of childbirth.

In Romans 9:8 Paul shifts from “children of the flesh [Abraham]” to “children of God”. The Shift is subtle but very significant. If Abraham’s spiritual seed comes through God’s promise and power, the Jewish people are not simply Abraham’s seed, but quite literally God’s children.

The Controversy Of Divine Election Romans 9:7-12

…nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.” that is, those who are the children of the flesh , these are not the children of God; but the children of the promise are counted as the seed. For this is the word promise: “At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son.” And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), it was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.” As it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hatred.” – Roman 9:7-13

The doctrine of divine election is, without doubt, the most controversial concept in Scripture. It is far more complex and controversial than the prophecy matrix of Daniel through Revelation or the prophetic explanation of Ezekiel’s war to be led by Russia and its Arab coalition of nations as they invade Israel in Ezekiel 38-39. That coalition will be decimated by the hand of God on the hills of Israel, killing 82 percent of Israel’s enemies.

First, it is obvious that divine election is taught in Scripture. (See Romans 9:27; 11:5, 7, 28.) The question is: To whom is divine election offered? In my opinion, divine election is offered only to the nation of Israel.

Consider what divine election actually means. It means that a loving and gracious God has elected to save some and elected to allow others to be lost for eternity in the fires of hell. Now you can understand the gravity of the controversy.

How can divine election be true if God has given to all men free moral agency, which is the power to choose to accept or to reject God’s offer of salvation? Free will, or free moral agency, means the ability of an individual to make his or her personal choice for or against God, and it is an indisputable fact in Scripture.

Bible Reasons Supporting Free Will

Consider the following ten Bible reasons validating the fact that God gives each individual the right to choose good or evil. Moses said to Israel, “I have set before you life and death…choose life (Deut. 30:19, emphasis added).

John 3:16 is the champion verse of free will: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him [which is an act of free will] should not perish but have everlasting life.”

Ten Bible Reasons Supporting Free Will

1. Romans 2:6-16 – To say that God saves some and sends the others to hell would make God a respecter of persons, which the Bible declares He is not.

2. Malachi 3:6 – Adam was given a choice in the Garden of Eden, The choice was to eat or not to eat the forbidden fruit. He chose to eat it, and angels with flaming swords drove Adam and Eve out of the garden to live under the Genesis curse.
If God left it up to Adam to choose in the beginning, then it is the same for every man today, for the Word declares, “I am the Lord, I do not change.”

3. Romans 9-11 – There is not one verse in the Bible, outside of Romans chapters 9 through 11, that states exclusively God’s position on the Jewish people, which is that [Jewish] man is not a free moral agent all the days of his life either to serve God or Satan.

4. Joshua 24:15 – There are Bible verses to prove that [Gentile] man is a free moral agent: “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve.”

5. Psalm 119:30 – “I have chosen the way of truth.”

6. Isaiah 7:15 – “Curds and honey He shall eat, that He may know to refuse the evil and choose the good.”

7. Isaiah 66:3 – “…they have chosen their own ways.”

8. Matthew 16:24 – “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself [free will], and take up his cross, and follow Me..”
9. 1 Corinthians 7:37 – “…has power over his own will.”

10. Revelation 22:17 – “Whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely.”

If divine election is true for Gentiles, as some major denominations teach, why go to church? Why witness? Why evangelize? If God has already determined who is going to go to heaven and who is going to go to hell, why pray? Why read the Bible?

If divine election is true, how can you say, “God is love”? How can the Holy Spirit write in John 3:16 that “God so loved the world…” if He is still going to send most of you to an everlasting hell? (See Matthew 7:13-14.)

Divine election is a fact for some of the Jewish people who are a “remnant according the election of grace” (Rom. 11:5). Divine election simply is not so for Gentiles.

God Begins With Abraham

Now, allow me to make the case for God’s divine election of Israel exclusively. God’s election concerning Israel begins with Abraham, whom God selected out of paganism (Josh. 24:2). Abraham was chosen to become the “father of all who believe.” At the time of Abraham’s election, he had no knowledge of God; therefore, he could not choose God.

It is clear in Scripture that God sought Abraham; Abraham did not seek God. Seeing that “the wickedness of man was great in the earth…his heart was only evil continually” (Gen. 6:5), God chose a man to be the physical and spiritual father of a people (the Jews), one word of the Bible, birth Jesus Christ, and bring the light of God to a world living in total darkness.

Abraham’s election is easy — God had to begin somewhere. God began in Genesis 12 with the father of all who believe, saying, “I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed”(v.3).

Isaac And Ishmael

Saint Paul presents his case for election with the birth of Isaac and Ishmael. When years passed and Abraham and Sarah did not have a son, Sarah suggested to Abraham that perhaps he should have a baby with her Egyptian handmaid, Hagar. Abraham said, “That sounds like the will of God to me, sweetheart” (HAGEE REVISED VERSION). He-he

Abraham and Hagar had Ishmael thirteen years before Isaac was born. His birth was the beginning of a family feud between Jews and Arabs that has endured until this day, dragging humanity toward a nuclear conflict in the Middle East.

Two sons…two choices

Ishmael was Abraham’s physical descendant, yet he was not chosen. The child of promise was Isaac. He was chosen to be the patriarch of “the children of the promise”(Roman 9:8).

There is a point to be considered in the births of Ishmael and Isaac. Ishmael was born when Abraham had the natural ability to produce a son. Isaac was born when both Abraham and Sarah were well past the age of producing children. Therefore, Isaac was born by the supernatural power of God.

This is the division between the natural children of Abraham (Arabs from Ishmael) and the “children of promise” (the Jews from Isaac).

Jacob And Esau Romans 9:9-13

For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son.” and not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), it was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.” As it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.” – Romans 9:-13

The Case of Jacob and Esau is the pinnacle of divine election. Each was a pure-blooded Jew. In the case of Isaac and Ishmael, one could argue that the ancestry of Isaac was better than Ishmael’s; therefore, Isaac was chosen. One could also argue that Ishmael had lived fourteen years and had the opportunity to sin, and this was rejected by God.

Not so with Jacob and Esau. They had the same mother and father and were conceived in the same act of sexual intercourse. The Greek word koite confirms this.

God’s decision contradicted the rules of Eastern society in which the younger brothers serves the older. God reversed the rule – saying the older (Esau) would serve the younger (Jacob). Paul makes it very clear in Romans 9:11 that this was done “that the purpose of God according to election might stand” (emphasis added).

Then God makes a statement that reverberated like thunder: “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated” (v.13). What a brutal statement for a loving God to make. Why did He do it?

He did it because God knows the end from the beginning. God knew that Esau would be a wild man who would, in part, produce that Edomites, who would attack the children of Israel as they came out of Egypt bound for the Promised Land. Because the Edomites attacked the children of Israel on the way to the Promised Land, God promised to be at war with the descendants of Esau and Amalek forever, until their remembrance was stricken from under heaven. (See Exodus 17:8-16.) Esau’s descendants would also produce a lineage that would attack and slaughter the Jews for centuries. Esau’s descendants included Haman, whose diabolical mind conceived the “final solution” of the Old Testament – the extermination of all Jews living in Persia. It was Esau’s descendants who produced the half-breed Jews of history who have persecuted and murdered the Jews beyond human comprehensions.

Adolf Hitler was a distant descendant of Esau. Pulitzer prize – winning author John Toland, in his book Adolf Hitler, records that Hitler was part Jewish.1 Toland traces his genealogy, which Hitler had destroyed when he came to power as the demonic leader of the Nazi barbarians.

It is no wonder God said, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.” Four thousands years after God made the statement, we have some comprehension as to why He said it. Yet the point bears repeating: it was “that the purpose of God according to election might stand” (Rom. 9:11)

Divine Election And The Jews

Now let’s examine the reasons why I believe divine election applies exclusively to some of the Jewish people.

A condicil intended for the jews
I have made the case that Romans 9-11 is intended exclusively in verses 4-5. Romans was written to the believers in Rome, except for the codicil of Romans 9-11. When correctly interpreting Scripture, you must remember who wrote it, to whom it was written, and for what purpose. The doctrine of election in Romans 9-11 concerns only the Jewish people.

An elect nation
The Bible speaks of Israel as an elect nation. Isaiah writes: “For Jacob My servant’s sake, and Israel My elect, I have even called you by your name” (Isa. 45:4).

When giving His prophecy digest to His twelve disciples on the crest of the Mount of Olives, Jesus said, “And unless those days were shortened [days of the Great Tribulation], no flesh would be saved; but for the elect’s sake [the Jewish people] those days will be shortened” (Matt. 24:22, emphasis added).

For those who believe “the elect” in this verse are Christians, please understand that during the Great Tribulation, Christians will already be in heaven at the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.

Two nations
There is no question that when God spoke to Rebekah before the birth of Jacob and Esau He referred to nations – not individuals. Genesis 25:23 records:

And the Lord said to her;
“Two nations are in your womb,
Two peoples shall be separated from your body;
One people [Israel] shall be stronger than the other [Edomites],
And the older [Esau] shall serve the younger [Jacob].”
Later in the Book of Genesis, a considerable amount of Scripture is written to describe the nation that Esau founded, and the remainder is about the nation of Israel.

the “father” of evolution, C. Darwin was taken out of school for failing grades and was a college drop-out

 Charles Darwin. 

(1809-1882)

 

Though i did not copy and paste his whole life… I did copy and paste his life as a child who was described as selfish and self-serving, and then in school he was kicked out for bad grades, and then later on in life was became a college drop out.

Darwin’s grantfather and a man named “Grant” put the idea of evolution in his head. Darwin just made it famous by using his family’s money to publish his books he wrote about evolution.

Charles darwin is a JOKE and so is EVOlUTION. If he was kicked out of grade school and was a drop out in college, then how in heck was he a scientist??????      pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

read for your selves!,
— Joe

1809 February 12
Charles Robert Darwin was born at The Mount in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England. He was named after his uncle (Charles) who had died a few years back, and his father (Robert).

1817 Spring
Darwin attended Mr. Case’s grammar school in Shrewsbury. He was a rather shy and reserved boy who invented wild stories, and showed off his athletic skills to the other boys. He was also very mischievous, and enjoyed being the center of attention in the household.

1817 July 15
Darwin’s mother, Susannah, died when he was eight years old.

1817 August
The burial of a Dragoon soldier outside Mr. Case’s school at Saint Chad’s parish church made a lasting impression on Darwin.

1818 September
Darwin joined his brother, Erasmus, at Shrewsbury Grammar School, run by the Revd. Samuel Butler. The focus of study was Greek and Roman reading and grammar. He developed a great fondness of Shakespeare and Byron during this time. As an aside, Darwin was referred to as “Bobby” by his family during his childhood.

1822
He and his brother setup a chemistry lab in the tool shed of the garden. Darwin enjoyed chemistry a great deal and it was during this time that he learned the basic principles of scientific experimentation.

1822 October
His brother, Erasmus, left home to study medicine at Christ’s College, Cambridge University.

1825 June 17
Darwin’s father took him out of Shrewsbury school due to his poor grades and his having no direction in life. It is ironic to think that at this time his father castigated Darwin for his idleness, claiming that if he carried on this way he would end up being a disgrace to himself and his family. Apparently Darwin cared for nothing but shooting birds, playing with dogs, and catching rats!

1825 Summer
Darwin spent the summer working as an assistant in his father’s medical practice.

1825 mid-October
Eager that Darwin should not “go astray” his father decided that his son will pursue a medical career as he and his grandfather did before him. Darwin was sent to the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, known as having one of the best medical schools in all of Europe. Once there he joined his brother, Erasmus, having finished most of his medical studies at Cambridge. They took lodgings together in 11 Lothian Street, right across from the University. Darwin did not particularly take a liking to medical studies – the fear of the sight of blood being a major hindrance, but the primary reason for his aversion appears to be that he found the study of medicine incredibly boring.

1826
His first year at Edinburgh was somewhat uneventful, about the only part of medical school that sparked Darwin’s interest were the chemistry lectures given by professor Thomas Hope.

1826 February – April
John Edmonstone, a freed black slave from Guyana, South America, taught Darwin taxidermy. The two of them often sat together for conversation, and John would fill Darwin’s head with vivid pictures of the tropical rain forests of South America. These pleasant conversations with John may have later inspired Darwin to dream about exploring the tropics. In any event, the taxidermy skills Darwin learned from him were indispensable during his voyage aboard H.M.S. Beagle in 1831.

1826 Summer
Darwin finished his first year of medical school and spent the summer hiking in the Welsh hills near his home in Shrewsbury. During this time Darwin read Revd. Gilbert White’s, “The Natural History of Selborne” and he came away from this book with a much greater appreciation for wildlife. Darwin started making detailed observations of birds and kept a notebook of their habits.

1826 November 6
Darwin began his second year of medical school at Edinburgh, but now he was alone; his brother, Erasmus, having left Edinburgh for London to study anatomy. Darwin spent a lot of time at the university museum, taking notes on the plants and animals on display there. He also joined the Plinian Society during this time and often attended their scientific debates. These debates were perhaps his first exposure to anti-Christian sentiments. The topics of these debates centered upon the merits of scientific investigation stemming from a an examination of natural causes rather than divine intervention. Darwin also attended Professor Robert Jameson’s lectures on Geology, and ironically he found himself dreadfully bored with the subject, and vowed never to read or study geology again.

1827 Winter – Spring
Robert Grant, a Scottish zoologist, became a very close friend of Darwin. They would often go out on long walks together at the Firth of Forth, an estuary just north of Edinburgh, discussing marine life and collecting specimens. On these walks Grant filled Darwin’s head with evolutionary ideas, especially those of Lamarck, whom Grant admired a great deal.

1827 March 27
Darwin gave his first scientific speech at a meeting of the Plinian Society. The subject was his discovery that the larva of sea-mats can swim, and that the tiny black specks inside old oyster shells were skate leech eggs. Not the most earth shattering discovery, but it was a start for Darwin.

1827 April
Darwin quit medical school for good.

1827 May
He visited London for the first time, then went with his Uncle, Josiah Wedgwood II, for a tour of Paris.

By this time Darwin’s father was rather displeased with his son, fearing he will amount to nothing but an “idle gentleman.” Plans were made for Darwin to study for the clergy, and his father arranged for him to attend Christ’s College at Cambridge University.

1827 Summer
Darwin started to take an interest in one of his sisters best friends, Fanny Owen; daughter of William Owen of Woodhouse. They spent much time riding horses together, shooting birds, playing billiards, and engaging in mild flirtations.

1827 October
Darwin was accepted into Christ’s College at Cambridge, but did not start until winter term because he needed to catch up on some of his studies.

1827 December
Darwin began studying for the clergy at Christ’s College. His brother, Erasmus, joined him at Cambridge where he would be studying for his medical exams.

1828 Winter Term
Once again Darwin did not take his studies very seriously, spending much of his free time collecting beetles, reading Shakespeare, and having dinner parties with his friends.

1828
William Darwin Fox, Darwin’s cousin, introduced him to Revd. John Stevens Henslow, Professor of Botany at Cambridge. Darwin started attending Henslow’s lectures and was very soon addicted to natural history. By spring term Darwin saw a natural science career in his future.

1828 Summer
Darwin spent the first part of summer at home in Shrewsbury. In June he went to the Welsh coast at Cardigan Bay, taking a math tutor with him so he could bone up on algebra, a subject he found very difficult to grasp. The tutoring only lasted a few weeks, at which time Darwin got back to serious business – collected beetles and fly fishing. He also went on a reading tour at Barmouth with his Cambridge friends, John Herbert and Thomas Butler. During this tour Darwin confided with Herbert that he had serious doubts about entering the clergy. Towards the end of summer he spent some time with Fanny Owen at her father’s estate.

1828 October 31
He returned to Christ’s College, and took up residence in Revd. William Paley’s former rooms.

1828 December
During winter break Darwin visited London where his brother showed him around to the Royal Institution, Linnean Society, and Zoological Gardens. These visits further ignited Darwin’s interest in natural history. Afterwards Darwin visited Woodhouse to see his girlfriend, Fanny Owen.

1829 Early Year
Darwin began to have more doubts regarding pursuing a religious career. His studies were not going very well, and he was spending too much time out in the countryside collecting beetles.

1829 February 21
He spent part of his spring break in London where he met with the famous entomologist, Revd. Frederick Hope. They spent many days talking about insects, and Hope gave him over one-hundred new species for his collection.

1829 Summer
Darwin spent the summer at home, visiting Fanny at Woodhouse, and hunting pheasants at Maer Hall (the estate of his uncle, Josiah Wedgwood II). During this time his brother, Erasmus, decided not to pursue a medical practice and his father put him up with a generous pension.

1829 early October
Darwin attended the Birmingham Music Festival with the Wedgwood family.

1829 October 15
Now back at Cambridge, Darwin spent all of his time studying for the preliminary exams coming up in March.

1830 February
Darwin’s relationship with Fanny was beginning to diminish. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but evidently Darwin had developed too much of a relationship with entomology (he had not visited her the previous winter break, having stayed in Cambridge to hunt beetles), and Fanny was being pursued by more attentive suitors. Just after he passed his “little go” exam they broke up.

1830 March 24
Darwin passed his “little go” exam at Cambridge. He was tested on translating Greek and Latin text (barely squeaked by), questions on the gospels (did fairly well with this), and on Paley’s Evidences of Christianity (he shined here, having a great fondness for Paley’s logic and simple elegance).

1830 Spring term
Most of the term was spent attending botany lectures from Professor Henslow. By this time Henslow had marked Darwin out as a gifted student with great promise. They often went on long walks together, discussing botany and going on plant collecting outings. Henslow also had Darwin over to his house for his Friday night dinner parties. It was during this time in his life that Darwin clearly saw his future; he would become country clergyman/naturalist like Henslow.

1830 August 11
Darwin went on holiday to Barmouth, in Wales. He spent sunny days collecting beetles, and rainy days fly fishing at the mountain lakes. When he was young Darwin was an avid hiker and during this holiday he explored the Capel Curig region and climbed Mt. Snowdon, the highest peak in Wales.

1830 September 10
Upon returning home at Shrewsbury he received a letter from Fanny that she was engaged to be married. This upset Darwin a great deal.

1830 October 7
Darwin returned to Cambridge for the fall term. He shifted his focus away from beetle collecting and exerted a huge burst of energy towards studying for his final exam. During this time Revd. Henslow became his private tutor.

1831 January 22
He took his final exam and passed with very good scores! The exam covered such topics as Homer, Virgil, Paley’s Moral and Political Philosophy (good scores here), Locke’s Essay concerning Human Understanding (did well here, too), mathematics (did not do so well), physics and astronomy (also, not very good). He came in 10th place out of 178 students who passed the exam.

1831 March/April
Darwin started thinking about settling down in a nice countryside parish as a clergyman with ample time to ramble about the countryside collecting bugs and plants. He read Paley’s “Natural Theology,” Sir John Herschel’s book, “Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy” and gained a burning zeal for science. Another book he read had a strong influence on his life; it was Alexander von Humboldt’s 7-vol. “Personal Narrative” of his South America adventures. Now Darwin began dreaming about the glorious tropical rain forests. Revd. Henslow suggested that he should go off and explore in the tropics for a short time.

1831 April
Inspired by Henslow’s advice, Darwin planned out a ocean voyage to explore Tenerife at the Canary Islands. He tried to get Revd. Henslow to go along with him but he could not go (his wife just had a baby). Darwin’s father tentatively approved the trip, wanting him to first work out the logistics and expenses.

1831 April 26
Darwin returned to Cambridge for graduation and studied for his trip. Seeing that Darwin would benefit from knowing a little something about geology, Henslow introduced him to Professor Adam Sedgwick, professor of Geology at Cambridge. Darwin was invited to attend Sedgwick’s geology lectures which oddly enough he enjoyed a great deal (this is ironic, as he found Jameson’s geology lectures at Edinburgh to be very boring).

1831 Spring
Not wanting to explore the tropics alone, Darwin convinced his friend, Marmaduke Ramsay, a tutor at Jesus College, to travel with him to the Canary Islands

1831 August 4 – 18
Darwin returned to Shrewsbury for summer vacation. Professor Sedgwick came by the house on 4 August loaded down with hiking gear and geology tools. He and Darwin went off to Northern Wales where Sedgwick gave him a crash course in field geology. Within a week Darwin was addicted to the subject. He only spent a week with Sedgwick, then went off to visit with friends at Barmouth, geologizing along the way.

1831 mid-August
Darwin’s Tenerife Island plans were crushed when found out that his friend, Ramsay, had died on 31 July. Months of preparation were wasted and Darwin was now very despondent.

How the Apostles / Disciples Died!

How the Apostles / Disciples Died!

 

 

 

1   Matthew

Suffered martyrdom in Ethiopia, killed by a sword wound.

2   Mark 

Died in Alexandria, Egypt, after being dragged by horses through the streets until he was dead.

3  Luke 

Was hanged in Greece as a result of his tremendous preaching to the lost.

4   John 

Faced martyrdom when he was boiled in huge basin of boiling oil during a wave of persecution in Rome. However, he was miraculously delivered from death. John was then sentenced to the mines on the prison island of Patmos. He wrote his prophetic Book of Revelation on Patmos. The apostle John was later freed and returned to serve as Bishop of Edessa in modern Turkey. He died as an old man, the only apostle to die peacefully.

5   Peter

He was crucified upside down on an x-shaped cross. According to church tradition it was because he told his tormentors that he felt unworthy to die in the same way that Jesus Christ had died.

6    James 

The Just, the leader of the church in Jerusalem, was thrown over a hundred feet down from the southeast pinnacleof the Temple when he refused to deny his faith in Christ. When they discovered that he survived the fall, his enemies beat James to death with a fuller’s club.

* This was the same pinnacle where Satan had taken Jesus during the Temptation.

7    James the Great 

Son of Zebedee, was a fisherman by trade when Jesus called him to a lifetime of ministry. As a strong leader of the church, James was ultimately beheaded at Jerusalem. The Roman officer who guarded James watched amazed as James defended his faith at his trial. Later, the officer walked beside James to the place of execution. Overcome by conviction, he declared his new faith to the judge and  knelt beside James to accept beheading as a Christian.

8    Bartholomew 

Also known as Nathaniel. He was a missionary to Asia . He witnessed for our Lord in present day Turkey.  Bartholomew was martyred for his preaching in Armenia where he was flayed to death by a whip.

9   Andrew 

Was crucified on an x-shaped cross in Patras, Greece. After being whipped severely by seven soldiers, they tied his body to the cross with cords to prolong his agony. His followers reported that, when he was led toward the cross, Andrew saluted it in these words:

‘I have long desired and expected this happy hour. The cross has been consecrated by the body of Christ hanging on it.’ He continued to preach to his tormentors for two days until he expired.

10  Thomas 

Was stabbed with a spear in India during one of his missionary trips to establish the church in the sub-continent

11  Jude 

Was killed with arrows when he refused to deny his faith in Christ.

12  Matthias

The apostle chosen to replace the traitor Judas Iscariot, was stoned and then beheaded.

13.   Paul 

Was tortured and then beheaded by the evil Emperor Nero at Rome in A.D. 67. Paul endured a lengthy imprisonment, which allowed him to write his many epistles to the churches he had formed throughout the Roman Empire. These letters, which taught many of the foundational doctrines of Christianity, form a large portion of the New Testament.

How is your Credit Report?

MY CREDIT REPORT

If my life was a credit report and I was trying to obtain salvation, based on my score I wouldn’t get it.

My history shows that I’ve been delinquent in praise, past due in prayer, my worship has been in collections and I’ve missed a few payments (tithes) or only paid half (you know how we put $20 in the basket and feel like we’ve done God a favor).

Not to mention that my debt (sin) to income (blessings) ratio is too high.

BUT I thank God that I was able to file bankruptcy (repentance) and it cleared me of all of my debt (sin). Now I have a co-signer (Jesus) whose score is FLAWLESS… Not one blemish (sin) on his report.

So now…. I QUALIFY for EVERYTHING! Most importantly I’ve inherited eternal life and I didn’t have to put one penny down.

All of my closing costs were covered when Jesus laid down His life for me!!!! I hear that my future home has all of the upgrades too.

Hardwood floors? Please!! I’ll be walking on gold! : – )

Thank You Lord for Your unmerited mercy, grace & favor!!

” Are You God’s Wife? “

An eye witness account from New York City :

On a cold day in December, some years ago: A little boy, about 10-years-old, was standing before a shoe store on the roadway, barefooted, peering through the window, and shivering with cold.  A lady approached the young boy and said, ‘My, but you’re in such deep thought staring in that window!’

‘I was asking God to give me a pair of shoes, ‘was the boy’s reply.

The lady took him by the hand, went into the store, and asked the clerk to get half a dozen pairs of socks for the boy. She then asked if he could give her a basin of water and a towel. He quickly brought them to her.

She took the little fellow to the back part of the store and, removing her gloves, knelt down, washed his little feet, and dried them with the towel, by this time, the clerk had returned with the socks. Placing a pair upon the boy’s feet, she purchased him a pair of shoes.  She tied up the remaining pairs of socks and gave them to him. She patted him on the head and said, ‘No doubt, you will be more comfortable now.’  As she turned to go, the astonished kid caught her by the hand, and looking up into her face, with tears in his eyes, asked her,

“Are you God’s wife?”